![]() Oct 21, 2011 The idea that Macs are better for video editing stems from Final Cut Pro being a lot cheaper than other non-linear editing suites and catering to how many video editors think and work. It was just an alternative. It isn't and yes software is the decider. The idea that Macs are better for video editing stems from Final Cut Pro being a lot cheaper than other non-linear editing suites and catering to how many video editors think and work. It was just an alternative. OS X was also a lot better than XP - technically and architecturally, but also again for how some people think/work), Windows 7 has closed the gap a lot since then. It is the same for musicians in that Logic is a great digital audio workstation and if you want to use it you need a Mac. Photoshop is the other big one that the ignorant cite as being superior on a Mac, but those days are long gone, especially with Quadro hardware acceleration now being used on the PC side. It was because Macs were superior for the print world due to colour management Adobe products have an edge under Windows these days as there is a bigger market and so more money can be spent on optimisations, plus Adobe and Apple don't get on that well now. ![]() Photostory 2015 deluxe for mac. While the Mac Pro hardware isn't amazing, nor at the peak of what Intel offer it is at the high-end. Maybe you can get another 20% performance for creative work for video, music and image editing in a Windows box over what you can get on the Mac side, but the OS is what you deal with and sit in front of each day and OS X and Apples applications just suite some people better. So much so that they are more productive than any extra hardware performance can boost their output. People argue this stuff all day online, but really they should be glad that there are competing companies in the OS/platform market as other wise you would see stagnation, lowered quality and rising costs. Really, have you read that CS5 performs 5% better in Windows than on OS X? This is 100% true. Google Hackintosh. BTW, a Hackintosh is only illegal if you sell a hackintosh. You have the right to install any piece of software onto a system of your choosing. If you need a massive amount of GPU acceleration for whatever then MAC and OS X is obviously not a good choice. You sould be able to install a 6850 or GTX 570 in a Mac Pro on your own and get it to work if you know what you're doing. At the same time, if it's a 3D heavy program that need a massive amount of GPU acceleration then you're stuck with only using 1 card, because OS X won't run more than 1 card. Which is fine in most cases anyway. People say a MAC is purely as a selling point. There is also a decent selection of Video Editing software that available for OS X. If you've invested heavily into software for a Mac then you're stuck on that platform. So, those people that have done this will defend OS X and Mac to their death. What they're doing is comparing a Mac Pro or an iMac to a low level Dell. Download spanish dictionary for mac. Put Linux onto a system that has a Core i7 processor, find a encoding program that works, and you have a powerful editing machine. • Tell us some more • Upload in Progress • Upload failed. Please upload a file larger than 100x100 pixels • We are experiencing some problems, please try again. • You can only upload files of type PNG, JPG, or JPEG. • You can only upload files of type 3GP, 3GPP, MP4, MOV, AVI, MPG, MPEG, or RM. • You can only upload photos smaller than 5 MB. • You can only upload videos smaller than 600MB. • You can only upload a photo (png, jpg, jpeg) or a video (3gp, 3gpp, mp4, mov, avi, mpg, mpeg, rm). • You can only upload a photo or a video.
0 Комментарии
Оставить ответ. |
АвторНапишите что-нибудь о себе. Не надо ничего особенного, просто общие данные. АрхивыКатегории |